You sit in a conference room presenting slides about a new feature. Someone asks why we are building it. The answer comes back as a jumble of customer requests, competitor moves, and vague assertions about market opportunity. Sound familiar? This confusion happens because teams skip straight to the what and how before they agree on the why. This is where understanding the difference between a PRFAQ and a Product Requirements Document (PRD) becomes critical for any team building something customers actually want.
A PRFAQ and a PRD serve different purposes in the product development lifecycle. The PRFAQ is a strategic decision-making document that answers why you should build something, what problem it solves for customers, and whether the solution is feasible, viable, and valuable. A PRD is a tactical execution document that specifies how to build the product with requirements, functional specifications, architecture diagrams, and technical details. The PRFAQ gives you permission to create a PRD, roadmap plan, or go-to-market strategy. It stays in the strategic zone and only touches tactical details when necessary to aid vision conversations.
The confusion between these documents stems from teams incorporating vision and strategy at the top of their PRDs or Jira tickets. This approach fails for two reasons. First, when you debate strategy and tactics together, execution details dominate the conversation. High-performance teams have a bias toward action and cannot help discussing implementation before establishing the desired outcome. Second, vision and strategy cannot be captured in isolation for a single feature. They must tie back to everything else the team or organization is doing.
The PRFAQ format forces discipline by keeping tactical plans out of strategic conversations. The six-page document focuses on three elements: what problem are we solving and for whom, what solution is feasible and valuable, and how does it get into customer hands. The internal FAQs section drives the strategic conversation, covering feasibility, usability, viability, and customer value. You will not find detailed product requirements or architecture diagrams in a PRFAQ because those artifacts belong in the execution phase after you approve the strategy.
The timing makes the relationship clear. You write a PRFAQ before you create operational plans, product roadmaps, or OKRs. Once an initiative is in motion after the team approves the PRFAQ, you derive the OKRs quarter after quarter from it. The PRFAQ might span multiple quarters or years for larger initiatives, while PRDs break down the work into specific sprints and releases. As the PRFAQ Framework explains, you do not decide whether you are traveling with Delta, Amtrak, or Royal Caribbean before you decide where you are going and why.
Modern AI coding tools create an interesting dynamic. With vibe coding tools and AI agents becoming more sophisticated, you might not need a traditional PRD for every project anymore. These tools can generate functional code from descriptions, reducing the need for exhaustive technical specifications. However, you will always need a PRFAQ because AI cannot tell you why you should build something or whether it solves a real customer problem. Even if an AI can write your entire codebase in minutes, it cannot tell you if you are building the right thing or if customers will pay for it. The PRFAQ answers the fundamental questions about customer pain points, business viability, and strategic fit that no coding tool can address.
The PRFAQ also serves as the source of truth that keeps teams aligned over time. Product initiatives span months or years. People join, people leave, memories fade, and the original vision gets corrupted through countless conversations. The PRFAQ becomes the artifact everyone can reference to understand the strategy. A PRD documents how you decided to implement a feature six months ago, but it does not capture the larger business vision.
Using both documents together creates a powerful product development process. Start with the PRFAQ to establish vision, validate customer problems, and get organizational alignment on strategy. Once approved, you create PRDs, functional specifications, and technical designs that specify exactly how to build what the PRFAQ describes. The PRFAQ stays relatively stable.
Ready to master the PRFAQ Framework and transform how your team makes strategic decisions? Read the book or subscribe to the newsletter for ongoing insights. You can also explore more articles on vision, strategy, and product development at www.theprfaq.com/articles.